Pesticides: breakthrough on cumulative risk assessment

EFSA announces: “Pesticides: breakthrough on cumulative risk assessment”

EFSA announced a breakthrough on cumulative risk assessment recently, you find the annoncement here: EFSA and its European partners have taken a major step forward in their work on assessing the cumulative risks from exposure to pesticides.

MCRA_150This is a major step in cumulative and probabilistic risk assessment (RA) in the field of dietary safety. I follow this topic with big interest and gained knowledge about the possibilities and limitations in this approach.

The background for the requirement of cumulative RA is legislated by:

Reg. (EC) No. 1107/2009, Art. 4: “residues of plant protection products … shall not have any harmful effects on human health, including that of vulnerable groups, … ,taking into account known cumulative and synergistic effects”

Up to now dietary risk assessments are conducted using deterministic models, i.e. point estimates of exposure vs hazard. Probabilistic models are under development in order to assess the variability of exposures (probabilistic risk assessment) and the exposure to chemicals with common effects to target organs (cumulative risk assessment). With support of the EU (ACROPOLIS project) a web-based software platform called MCRA (Monte Carlo Risk Assessment) was developed by RIVM to conduct probabilistic exposure and risk assessment of chemicals in the diet according to EFSA guidance documents.

EU provided further founding to the MCRA project (EU project EuroMix). Further cumulative assessment groups of molecules will be established.

The topic is highly complex and certain “black-boxes” in the software tool MCRA are not verifyable. With the announcement from EFSA input data to the model (consumption, background residues from market-bask surveys, variability factors, etc.) will become available to the industry and NGOs.

EFSA is establishing a data warehouse and thereby seeking transparency in order to gain trust of consumers.

Is it all about shareholder value?

Is it all about shareholder value?

News popped up from the critical shareholder community of Syngenta (www.kritische-syngenta-aktionaere.com). Mr Folke Rauscher published an article in the Basler Zeitung, here the link from the Handelszeitung. The solution suggested by the critical shareholder community is not very complex: replace the SYN management board in order to increase share value.

Syngenta’s credo is “Bringing plant protection to life”. I think that agrochemicals, with all the pros and cons, are required for a growing community on our planet. The industry is under pressure, and more pressure in order to serve shareholders is not required.

Benzovindiflupyr (Solatenol), a new SYN molecule, was recently approved in the EU, the peer review from EFSA you find here: EFSA Journal 2015;13(3):4043. I think this is a big milestone, well done folks! Benzovindiflupyr is a modern fugicide and a very interesting molecule for mixture products in order to address resistance issues. There is big potential in this molecule.

However, the shareholders want money, the only and single focus. No interest in products, solutions or suggestions for the future in this important business.

Thanks, Mr Rauscher..

Consolidation in the agrochemical business

Consolidation in the agrochemical business

People interested in the agrochemical business heared about the merger of DuPont and Dow Chemical by the end of 2015. We also followed the news about possible mergers or take-offs of Syngenta. After Syngenta denied an offer from Monsanto (CEO Mike Mack left the company thereafter under pressure from investors), ChemChina is now interested in a 70% share of Syngenta.

ChemChina is a state-owned company and the liberal newspaper NZZ reports about a paradoxon in liberality to sell a Swiss company to China. And it was the Basler Zeitung in an article (BZ 02/01/2016, PDF) who warned about selling SYN to a Chinese state owned company (“..these communists..”). We all know that a well-known CH politician owns the majority of the BZ – he is often in national and international news, earned his billions also in the chemical industry.

Questions arise: what will happen with the agrochemical sections of DuPont and DOW? Big players such as Bayer Crop Science or BASF might be interested in split-offs, and for sure Syngenta as well. Fact is that SYN share prices are comparable to a roller coaster, here the last years development:

As a specialist in dietary safety I trust in the safety of agrochemical products, I rarely buy organic food. I also believe that modern agrochemical products are required to provide food for a growing population on our planet. However I do not appreciate the pressure from major investors to dominate and control the future of the responsible companies in the field.

The GAME OVER referendum in Switzerland intends to stop the dealing with nutritional products on stock markets. The Swiss government recommends a NO to the referendum, since nutritional products are not included in the SMI (do not forget we have NESTLE here). Anyway, I support this idea and Switzerland could take a exemplary role in this issue.

Revisiting EFSA@EXPO: How do we train the food safety experts of the future?

Revisiting EFSA@EXPO: How do we train the food safety experts of the future?

What is the future of education in food safety assessment? What are the current developments in training? Scientists from universities, research centres and education bodies shared their ideas on how to handle challenges in food safety risk assessment in an ever-changing and increasingly complex environment.

Please find the EFSA publication here: How do we train the food safety experts of the future?

I will soon publish a post about the EFSA Data Warehouse, which is crucial for probabilistic and cumulative risk assessment.